Mostrando postagens com marcador OMS. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador OMS. Mostrar todas as postagens

terça-feira, 26 de janeiro de 2010

Declarações da OMS sobre a pandemia H1N1: nega conflito de interesse e reafirma o estado de pandemia

O tema da pandemia da influenza H1N1 e assunto recurrente neste blog. Recentemente, divulgamos as acusações de possível conflito de interesse de membros do painel de aconselhamento da Organização Mundial da Saude (OMS) e também participantes da industria farmacêutica. Ha em curso uma investigação do parlamento europeu sobre o tema.
Hoje Erika Aragão, nossa colega na FIOCRUZ-Bahia, nos enviou noticia sobre as declarações  da OMS sobre o tema. 
A OMS vem de divulgar declarações feitas no Conselho da Europa (texto completo) e sobre as alegações de conflito de interesse (texto completo).
Nas declarações, a OMS, reafirma os seus necessários vínculos com a industria farmacêutica e assegura que opera com mecanismos de salvaguarda para lidar com conflito de interesse:
"WHO recognizes that global cooperation with a range of partners, including the private sector, is essential to pursue public health objectives today and in the future. Numerous safeguards are in place to manage conflicts of interest or perceived conflicts of interest among members of WHO advisory groups and expert committees."
Reafirma ainda a existência da pandemia:
"The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible. We welcome any legitimate review process that can improve our work."
A declaração do Dr. Fukuda, no Conselho da Europa, em nome da OMS, conclui com:




"In closing, I would like to reiterate the most basic point. This current influenza pandemic is a scientifically well-documented event in which the emergence and spread of a new influenza virus has caused an unusual epidemiological pattern of disease throughout the world. This is not an arbitrary matter of word-smithing, definitions or polemics. The labelling of the pandemic as "fake" is to ignore recent history and science and to trivialize the deaths of over 14 000 people and the many additional serious illnesses experienced by others.
As we go forward, the world will continue to face many difficult health challenges. The resources to face them are limited, especially among developing countries, and finding ways to do this better is the shared responsibility of Member States and organizations, such as the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, as well as WHO."

terça-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2010

Conflito de interesse na declaração de pandemia da gripe H1N1?

O blog "Vi o mundo" noticia OMS revê regras para declarar pandemias. Hoje o parlamento europeu inicia uma investigação de influencia da indústria farmacêutica na declaração da pandemia pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS).
A notícia de exagero na recomendação da OMS já circulava em jornais europeus, como o Guardian Swine flu as elusive as WMD. The real threat is mad scientist syndrome. O El Pais noticia também sobre a possível falta de transparência na recomendação no artigo Gripe y transparencia, e uma interessante entrevista com Salvador Macip sobre o risco de perda de credibilidade das autoridades sanitárias "Si llega una pandemia grave no lo creeremos".
O artigo de Jamil Chade no blog Vi o Mundo diz:  "Hoje, o Parlamento do Conselho da Europa inicia uma investigação para apurar suspeitas de influência indevida de farmacêuticas na OMS. Alguns cientistas da organização teriam constado na folha de pagamento de laboratórios. A acusação veio após a imprensa dinamarquesa obter oficialmente informações de que membros do grupo criado para sugerir medidas à entidade eram cientistas financiados por empresas do setor."

sábado, 5 de setembro de 2009

Recomendações da OMS para tratamento da gripe H1N1

Recommended use of antivirals

Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 briefing note 8

Related link:

WHO Guidelines for Pharmacological Management of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza and other Influenza Viruses
20 August 2009

21 AUGUST 2009 | GENEVA -- WHO is today issuing guidelines for the use of antivirals in the management of patients infected with the H1N1 pandemic virus.

The guidelines represent the consensus reached by an international panel of experts who reviewed all available studies on the safety and effectiveness of these drugs. Emphasis was placed on the use of oseltamivir and zanamivir to prevent severe illness and deaths, reduce the need for hospitalization, and reduce the duration of hospital stays.

The pandemic virus is currently susceptible to both of these drugs (known as neuraminidase inhibitors), but resistant to a second class of antivirals (the M2 inhibitors).

Worldwide, most patients infected with the pandemic virus continue to experience typical influenza symptoms and fully recover within a week, even without any form of medical treatment. Healthy patients with uncomplicated illness need not be treated with antivirals.

On an individual patient basis, initial treatment decisions should be based on clinical assessment and knowledge about the presence of the virus in the community.

In areas where the virus is circulating widely in the community, clinicians seeing patients with influenza-like illness should assume that the pandemic virus is the cause. Treatment decisions should not wait for laboratory confirmation of H1N1 infection.

This recommendation is supported by reports, from all outbreak sites, that the H1N1 virus rapidly becomes the dominant strain.

Treat serious cases immediately

Evidence reviewed by the panel indicates that oseltamivir, when properly prescribed, can significantly reduce the risk of pneumonia (a leading cause of death for both pandemic and seasonal influenza) and the need for hospitalization.

For patients who initially present with severe illness or whose condition begins to deteriorate, WHO recommends treatment with oseltamivir as soon as possible. Studies show that early treatment, preferably within 48 hours after symptom onset, is strongly associated with better clinical outcome. For patients with severe or deteriorating illness, treatment should be provided even if started later. Where oseltamivir is unavailable or cannot be used for any reason, zanamivir may be given.

This recommendation applies to all patient groups, including pregnant women, and all age groups, including young children and infants.

For patients with underlying medical conditions that increase the risk of more severe disease, WHO recommends treatment with either oseltamivir or zanamivir. These patients should also receive treatment as soon as possible after symptom onset, without waiting for the results of laboratory tests.

As pregnant women are included among groups at increased risk, WHO recommends that pregnant women receive antiviral treatment as soon as possible after symptom onset.

At the same time, the presence of underlying medical conditions will not reliably predict all or even most cases of severe illness. Worldwide, around 40% of severe cases are now occurring in previously healthy children and adults, usually under the age of 50 years.

Some of these patients experience a sudden and very rapid deterioration in their clinical condition, usually on day 5 or 6 following the onset of symptoms.

Clinical deterioration is characterized by primary viral pneumonia, which destroys the lung tissue and does not respond to antibiotics, and the failure of multiple organs, including the heart, kidneys, and liver. These patients require management in intensive care units using therapies in addition to antivirals.

Clinicians, patients, and those providing home-based care need to be alert to warning signals that indicate progression to a more severe form of illness, and take urgent action, which should include treatment with oseltamivir.

In cases of severe or deteriorating illness, clinicians may consider using higher doses of oseltamivir, and for a longer duration, than is normally prescribed.

Antiviral use in children

Following the recent publication of two clinical reviews, [1,2] some questions have been raised about the advisability of administering antivirals to children.

The two clinical reviews used data that were considered by WHO and its expert panel when developing the current guidelines and are fully reflected in the recommendations.

WHO recommends prompt antiviral treatment for children with severe or deteriorating illness, and those at risk of more severe or complicated illness. This recommendation includes all children under the age of five years, as this age group is at increased risk of more severe illness.

Otherwise healthy children, older than 5 years, need not be given antiviral treatment unless their illness persists or worsens.

Danger signs in all patients

Clinicians, patients, and those providing home-based care need to be alert to danger signs that can signal progression to more severe disease. As progression can be very rapid, medical attention should be sought when any of the following danger signs appear in a person with confirmed or suspected H1N1 infection:

  • shortness of breath, either during physical activity or while resting
  • difficulty in breathing
  • turning blue
  • bloody or coloured sputum
  • chest pain
  • altered mental status
  • high fever that persists beyond 3 days
  • low blood pressure.

In children, danger signs include fast or difficult breathing, lack of alertness, difficulty in waking up, and little or no desire to play.

________________________________

[1] Neuraminidase inhibitors for treatment and prophylaxis of influenza in children: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Shun-Shin M, Thompson M, Heneghan C et al. BMJ 2009;339:b3172; doi:10.1136/bmj.b3172
[2] Prescription of anti-influenza drugs for healthy adults: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Burch J, Stock C et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2009; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70199-9